![]() Their ticker symbol) and you may see a pattern. Match that with the lack of an IPHI yahoo message board (Iĭo not know of any company that does NOT have a yahoo message board for You can see the pattern repeating when Inphi based it’s IPO on the promise of Said that they had “destroyed all infringing product” in court docs. MetaRAM idea was his own – involving a bit of “sorcery”.Īs part of settlement in NLST vs. It’s founder Suresh Rajan worked at Rambus prior to MetaRAM.Īfter the MetaRAM debacle (claiming someone else’s IP as their own) he is nowīack in 2008, at the height of MetaRAM PR, Suresh Rajan was claiming the It turns out there is a link between MetaRAM and Rambus also. Unlike RMBS which let them talk and built up IP based on where JEDEC was Was starting to was already in NLST’s IP portfolio (i.e. Netlist in contrast informed Mian Quddus (see posts above) that the stuff JEDEC To use to build it’s private IP portfolio – in effect blind-siding the JEDEC. However, Rambus behavior at the JEDEC was in fact sucking info out of the JEDEC Some detractors would suggest that Netlist is a “patent troll” and make reference "oh the tangled web we weave" in a tiny incestuous industry ! The claim that NLST has unclean hands for '912 patent for JEDEC standards (Bill Gervasi could be the 'center' of the patent controversy) We will never know the full story but before Google took NLST IP elsewhere it would have been impossible for NLST to supply 100% of Google's DIMM demand in the mid 2000s so at least one more vendor would be needed if not two vendors to produce the necessary DIMMs USPTO Allows All Claims in the Reexamination of Netlist’s ‘537 (which is a continuation of ‘386 patent etc.) and ‘274 Patents As the reexam process proceeds the patent is built up from scratch – which is why the reexam process is nearly as long as a patent granting process the “rejection” of the claims of the patent. In these, the USPTO has completed the first office action – which frames the problem in hand – i.e. when reexams were all similar and happening at same time). In fact given the way reexams are conducted, there may be no better way than to consolidate (esp. This is probably simpler for NLST – as they can make consolidated responses as well. The USPTO has consolidated a total of 5 reexams into two reexams – one for ‘386 patent, and one for ‘912 patent. GOOG/SMOD have reexams against NLST patents. Some interesting details there, especially (to me) the section about a patent reexamination of the ‘912 patent requested from SMOD and Google, with a possible decision as to whether that reexamination will be granted or denied expected in January The 11 year delay for patent re-examination as three companies gang up on NLST They maybe separate cases but they are fighting over the same IP. For the life of me I don’t know why the court wouldn grant a stay in one case and not the other. I am pretty sure I had read the docs concerning this but don’t seem to be able to access them any more. I believe an stay was also filed and issued in the NLST vs GOOG case. GOOG file and was granted a stay in the GOOG vs NLST case pending determination by the UPSTO. Inphi has successfully filed a challenge with the USPTO regarding the 386 patent. HyperCloud was short lived and never had a chance due to the Great Recession and the triumvirate of court case challenges to NLST key patents TXN is exited the buffer chipset for LRDIMM segment The 10-Q now reveals they had agreed to settle May 7, 2010. Court-mandated settlement conference was set for. As stated in previous post above: quote: From court docket info, the settlement happened. The court dismissed the case with prejudice. On May 7, 2010, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. ![]() TXN litigation settlement: quote: Trade Secret Claim On November 18, 2008, the Company filed a claim for trade secret misappropriation against Texas Instruments (“TI”) in Santa Clara County Superior Court, based on TI’s disclosure of confidential Company materials to the JEDEC standard-setting body. Netlist Settles Lawsuit With Texas Instruments () Netlist Announces Settlement of Patent Infringement Lawsuits With MetaRAM ()Īs part of the settlement NLST and MetaRam cross licensed 2 patents - NLST's '386 patent and MetaRam's '220 patent NLST and MetaRam settle patent infringement cases ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |